thats a little nit picky. theres a dearth of synonyms at times, especially when dealing with economic subjects. naturally, anything you spend money on is an investment. i think the issue here is that in a general economic sense as presented by a lot of cryptocurrency projects, the marketing strategy is that people will make money because their currency will "go to the moon!" PUFFScoin doesnt make that promise, because forward looking statements like that are irresponsible and present a false sense of the market. we hope that people who purchase PUFFScoin will hold them and use them to interact with the services we provide on our blockchain, or to use them at marketplaces... our own storefront or independent user marketplaces... to purchase goods and services. we are building utility and usability, and what the market does with that, we have no control over, so we dont prognosticate. so yes, "protecting investors interests" because if you decide to back our project, receiving PUFFScoin in return, we want to make sure you can use those tokens in any number of ways.Butcher Bob wrote:Really? Seeing as you provide cryptocurrency ticker info at the top of your web page, as well as a section labled "Protecting Investors' Interests", it would seem you disagree with yourself.PUFFSdev wrote:i just wanted to touch on one last thing. the idea of PUFFScoin as an investment. i dont think we've ever presented it in that light.
i FOUGHT a case against the nova scotia government to have my medical cannabis covered. that was a little over a year ago. and was, as i mentioned previously, when my seizures were uncontrolled. i had been forced out of traditional work (i was doing archaeological survey work in alberta) because of my epilepsy, and when medical EI ran out, my doctor still wouldnt clear me to return to work. eventually, we applied for social services. i applied to have my prescription covered, but they have set aside conditions within their legislation that actually precludes those who had cannabis related issues from the rights of appeal that anyone else has. i argued up to a board level appeal, using the supreme court decision of nova scotia that said they were in the wrong with denying coverage for cannabis. that issue is currently before the nova scotia human rights tribunal.A simple search revealed that you lost a case to have the government cover your MMJ costs last year, as reported by CBC. When considering that, I would assume either you are good enough at your cryptocurrency work to provide for your own costs, or that your work is not good enough to generate income, which would cause me to question the validity/reliability of your present offering.
when i did get some help from my fellow SubGenii and had my prescription covered for a good three months, i was able to get back to work, and yes, my work within cryptocurrency, some smart investing when the price of bitcoin spiked at Christmas, and living within my means, i afford my prescription with no problem now. ive sadly become a snooty connoisseur, my sativas during the day and indicas at night, when my head feels like spiders are starting crawl around the inside of my skull i use some live resin.
as ive said, cannabis saved my life, and because i wasn't fighting seizure recovery most of the day, my brains feeling like oatmeal, i was able to concentrate on things like building a cryptocurrency, and adapting smart contract code to produce applications that will provide cannabis, one way or another, to people who are experiencing what i did, fallen thru the cracks and having to struggle when having assistance covering their prescription would make the biggest difference in the world.
compassionate pricing is an important aspect of the dispensary side of things, but we havent really found a metric to assist those receiving social programming that has prohibitions against cannabis coverage. those ideas would require more invasion of client privacy than id be comfortable with.